While I'm tired and exhausted,
let me write this post about syllogism, which I think is inseparable from that
hoity-toity feeling that people call love.
Basically, a syllogism contains
two premises that are assumed to be true, and a conclusion. Let P1, P2, P3 and
so on be the premises and C be the conclusion. Here are some common valid forms
and examples:
1.
Disjunctive
Syllogism
P1: P or Q
P2: Not Q
C: Therefore, P.
Example:
I love you or you love me.
I don’t love you.
Therefore, you love me. #weh
2.
Hypothetical
Syllogism
P1: If P, then Q.
P2: If Q, then R.
C: Therefore, if P, then R.
Example:
If I love you, then you love
another guy.
If you love another guy, then
I’ll wait for you.
Therefore, if I love you, then
I’ll wait for you.
3.
Modus
Ponens
P1: If P, then Q.
P2: P
C: Therefore, Q.
Example:
If I love you, then you love me.
I love you.
Therefore, you love me. #weh
4.
Modus
Tollens
P1: If P then Q.
P2: Not Q
C: Therefore, not P.
Example:
If I love you, then you love me.
You don’t love me.
Therefore, I don’t love you.
#hugot
Syllogisms aren’t limited in
those forms. There are what we call categorical syllogisms, and there are
fifteen valid forms. As for how the names are derived, how validity is proven,
I’ll leave that either to the books or Wikipedia. Here are some of the fifteen
valid forms and their examples: (Also for the examples, assume that all that
are in the subject or the predicate are nouns.)
1.
Datisi
(AII-3)
P1: All M are P.
P2: Some M are S.
C: Therefore, Some S are P.
P2: Some M are S.
C: Therefore, Some S are P.
Example:
All chocolates are romantics.
Some chocolates are bitterness’s.
Therefore, some bitterness’s are
romantics. (Only a little…)
2.
Darii
(AII-1)
P1: All M are P.
P2: Some S are M.
C: Therefore, Some S are P.
Example:
All friend-zones are forever.
Some only-friends are friend-zones.
Therefore, some only-friends are
forever. (Hence, only-friends doesn’t mean forever friend-zone.)
3.
Camestres
(AEE-2)
P1: All P are M.
P2: No S are M.
C: Therefore, No S are P.
C: Therefore, No S are P.
Example:
All romances are nonsense’s.
No love’s are nonsense’s.
Therefore, no love’s are
romances.
4.
Festino
(EIO-2)
P1: No P are M.
P2: Some S are M.
C: Therefore, Some S are not P.
Example:
No good things are tragedies.
Some heartbreaks are tragedies.
Therefore, some heartbreaks are
not good things. (Does it actually mean that some are?)
5.
Fresison
(EIO-4)
P1: No M are P.
P2: Some M are S.
C: Therefore, Some S are not P.
Example:
No heartbreaks are happiness.
Some happiness are
beings-together.
Therefore, some beings-together
are not heartbreak. (…and some beings together are heartbreak due to
friend-zone…)
6.
Celarent
(EAE-1)
P1: No M are P.
P2: All S are M.
C: Therefore, No S are P.
Example:
No heroes are cowards.
All lovers are heroes.
Therefore, no lovers are cowards.
#preach
7.
Cesare
(EAE-2)
P1: No P are M.
P2: All S are M.
C: Therefore, No S are P.
Example:
No materialisms are everlasting.
All love’s are everlasting.
Therefore, no love’s are
materialisms. (Ideally speaking…)
8.
Ferison
(EIO-3)
P1: No M are P.
P2: Some M are S.
C: Therefore, Some S are not P.
Example:
No relationships are
forever-lasting-types.
Some relationships are
friendships.
Therefore, some friendships are
not forever-lasting-types.
9.
Ferio
(EIO-1)
P1: No M are P.
P2: Some S are M.
C: Therefore, Some S are not P.
Example:
No romances are forever’s.
Some flowers are romances.
Therefore, some flowers are not
forever’s. (That’s why cacti are better. They withstand tribulations.
Relationships should be like the cacti, not the flower.)
10.
Dimaris
(IAI-4)
P1: Some P are M.
P2: All M are S.
C: Therefore, Some S are P.
Example:
Some love’s are affections.
All affections are expressions.
Therefore, some expressions are
love’s. (That’s why we need to take expressions seriously…)
11.
Disamis
(IAI-3)
P1: Some M are P.
P2: All M are S.
C: Therefore, Some S are P.
Example:
Some moments are temporary’s.
All moments are experiences.
Therefore, some experiences are
temporary’s. (Just like heartbreaks…)
To conclude, although logic isn't
always the best way to arrive at an emotional conclusion, it still proves to
provide good insight.
No comments:
Post a Comment